Train yourself to see impossible colors
Hiding
 in the shadows between the colors we see everyday are weird, impossible
 shades, colors that you shouldn't be able to see and generally don't...
 unless you know how. Here's a simple guide to seeing impossible and 
imaginary colors.
Image by Cody James.
 Understanding
 a little about how humans perceive color is crucial to seeing 
impossible colors. Our eyes use something called opponent process to 
work more efficiently. This plays upon the fact that the eye's primary 
light receptors, the cones, have certain overlaps in what light 
wavelengths they can perceive. To save energy, our eyes measure the 
differences between the responses of various cones rather than figuring 
out each cone's individual response.
We long ago
 found out that there are three opponent channels: red vs. green, blue 
vs. yellow, and black vs. white. (Technically, black and white aren't 
colors, and their opponent process has more to do with brightness than 
anything else.) Now, let's say you stare right at the bluest object 
you've ever seen. Your cones that primary perceive the blue wavelengths 
are going to be excited, while the cones responsible for yellow will be 
inhibited. If you then switched to looking at the yellowest thing you've
 ever seen, the exact opposite would happen.
It probably isn't all that shocking to point out the cones can't be excited and
 inhibited at the same time. That means that it's impossible to see an 
object that's simultaneously blue and yellow or red and green. I'm not 
talking about what happens when you mix those colors and then 
look at them - obviously, you'd get green and a sort of murky brown if 
you did that. No, what I'm talking about here are colors that are equal 
parts blue and yellow at the exact same time. Can you imagine that? 
Well, you shouldn't be able to, because that's an impossible color.
 
 This might 
all seem a bit abstract, but there's some evidence backing up the 
existence of such colors. A 1983 experiment featured a special machine 
which separated the fields of vision of the test subject's eyes. One eye
 would see a red screen, while the other would see a green screen. Given
 time, the colors would mix together, but the mixing only occurred in 
the brain. Without the eye there to mediate the mixing, red and green 
didn't become brown - they became a new color, a reddish-green color 
that none of the test subjects had ever seen before, and that includes 
an artist with an extensive knowledge of different hues and shades.
Admittedly,
 the methodology of that experiment has since been criticized, and many 
vision researchers say impossible colors are called that for a reason – 
they really are impossible. There are, to be sure, a lot of alternative 
explanations for the colors the people saw: they were just intermediate 
colors between the two, the experimenters hadn't properly controlled for
 luminance and that threw off the results, or the test subjects were 
really just see red, then green, then red, and so on, and never actually
 viewing them simultaneously.
These are all fair points. However, if I may make a counterpoint, you're ruining all the fun, vision experts.
 Sure, impossible colors might actually be impossible, but that doesn't 
change the fact that test subjects saw colors they had never seen 
before. Impossible colors might not exist, but if it's possible to fool 
our brains into thinking they do, then I'd say that's still pretty 
awesome.
 This is one of the least scientific viewpoints I've ever put forward, 
and I'm not exactly proud of it, but hey...impossible colors are cool. 
Now relax each eye on these two plus signs and see if you can't make 
some impossible colors appear. Let your eyes cross so that the two 
pluses are right on top of each other. I'll say right now that not 
everyone is going to be able to see these weird colors - I'm almost 
certain that I can't - but I'd still say it's worth a try.
I'd be remiss if I didn't also mention imaginary colors. These are 
colors that cannot be produced in the physical light spectrum, and yet 
it's possible to derive them mathematically. The easiest way to 
understand what an imaginary color is would be to think about the three 
wavelengths of cones - short, medium, and long. Like I said when talking
 about the imaginary colors, there's an overlap in the responses of 
these different wavelengths.
But what if
 you had a color that only created a response in the medium wavelengths?
 In real life, this can't happen, as anything that excites the medium 
wavelengths is going to excite one or both of the other wavelengths. But
 if you did have a color that only excited the medium, green 
wavelengths while leave the other two types alone, then you'd be able to
 see a color greener than any real green.
So that's 
the theory - here's how you do it. Again, you've to be smart about your 
opponent processes. If you want to see an imaginary green, you need to 
find an example of heavily saturated red and one of a heavily saturated 
green. Stare at the red color for as long as you can, then switch to 
looking at the green. The red receptors have become too fatigued to do 
their job and be inhibited by the green color. That means your green 
receptors are getting excited with nothing to counterbalance them. The 
result is the greenest color you've ever seen, one that can't exist in 
the physical world.
Again, this
 might all seem a bit out there, but America's most lovable evil 
geniuses have known about this for years. Walt Disney World took 
advantage of this effect in their design of the EPCOT park, making the 
pavements a particular shade of pink that tires out the red receptors 
and forces the park's grass to look greener than it really is. On second
 thought, I'm not sure that makes this seem any less out there.