Train yourself to see impossible colors
Hiding
in the shadows between the colors we see everyday are weird, impossible
shades, colors that you shouldn't be able to see and generally don't...
unless you know how. Here's a simple guide to seeing impossible and
imaginary colors.
Image by Cody James.
Understanding
a little about how humans perceive color is crucial to seeing
impossible colors. Our eyes use something called opponent process to
work more efficiently. This plays upon the fact that the eye's primary
light receptors, the cones, have certain overlaps in what light
wavelengths they can perceive. To save energy, our eyes measure the
differences between the responses of various cones rather than figuring
out each cone's individual response.
We long ago
found out that there are three opponent channels: red vs. green, blue
vs. yellow, and black vs. white. (Technically, black and white aren't
colors, and their opponent process has more to do with brightness than
anything else.) Now, let's say you stare right at the bluest object
you've ever seen. Your cones that primary perceive the blue wavelengths
are going to be excited, while the cones responsible for yellow will be
inhibited. If you then switched to looking at the yellowest thing you've
ever seen, the exact opposite would happen.
It probably isn't all that shocking to point out the cones can't be excited and
inhibited at the same time. That means that it's impossible to see an
object that's simultaneously blue and yellow or red and green. I'm not
talking about what happens when you mix those colors and then
look at them - obviously, you'd get green and a sort of murky brown if
you did that. No, what I'm talking about here are colors that are equal
parts blue and yellow at the exact same time. Can you imagine that?
Well, you shouldn't be able to, because that's an impossible color.
This might
all seem a bit abstract, but there's some evidence backing up the
existence of such colors. A 1983 experiment featured a special machine
which separated the fields of vision of the test subject's eyes. One eye
would see a red screen, while the other would see a green screen. Given
time, the colors would mix together, but the mixing only occurred in
the brain. Without the eye there to mediate the mixing, red and green
didn't become brown - they became a new color, a reddish-green color
that none of the test subjects had ever seen before, and that includes
an artist with an extensive knowledge of different hues and shades.
Admittedly,
the methodology of that experiment has since been criticized, and many
vision researchers say impossible colors are called that for a reason –
they really are impossible. There are, to be sure, a lot of alternative
explanations for the colors the people saw: they were just intermediate
colors between the two, the experimenters hadn't properly controlled for
luminance and that threw off the results, or the test subjects were
really just see red, then green, then red, and so on, and never actually
viewing them simultaneously.
These are all fair points. However, if I may make a counterpoint, you're ruining all the fun, vision experts.
Sure, impossible colors might actually be impossible, but that doesn't
change the fact that test subjects saw colors they had never seen
before. Impossible colors might not exist, but if it's possible to fool
our brains into thinking they do, then I'd say that's still pretty
awesome.
This is one of the least scientific viewpoints I've ever put forward,
and I'm not exactly proud of it, but hey...impossible colors are cool.
Now relax each eye on these two plus signs and see if you can't make
some impossible colors appear. Let your eyes cross so that the two
pluses are right on top of each other. I'll say right now that not
everyone is going to be able to see these weird colors - I'm almost
certain that I can't - but I'd still say it's worth a try.
I'd be remiss if I didn't also mention imaginary colors. These are
colors that cannot be produced in the physical light spectrum, and yet
it's possible to derive them mathematically. The easiest way to
understand what an imaginary color is would be to think about the three
wavelengths of cones - short, medium, and long. Like I said when talking
about the imaginary colors, there's an overlap in the responses of
these different wavelengths.
But what if
you had a color that only created a response in the medium wavelengths?
In real life, this can't happen, as anything that excites the medium
wavelengths is going to excite one or both of the other wavelengths. But
if you did have a color that only excited the medium, green
wavelengths while leave the other two types alone, then you'd be able to
see a color greener than any real green.
So that's
the theory - here's how you do it. Again, you've to be smart about your
opponent processes. If you want to see an imaginary green, you need to
find an example of heavily saturated red and one of a heavily saturated
green. Stare at the red color for as long as you can, then switch to
looking at the green. The red receptors have become too fatigued to do
their job and be inhibited by the green color. That means your green
receptors are getting excited with nothing to counterbalance them. The
result is the greenest color you've ever seen, one that can't exist in
the physical world.
Again, this
might all seem a bit out there, but America's most lovable evil
geniuses have known about this for years. Walt Disney World took
advantage of this effect in their design of the EPCOT park, making the
pavements a particular shade of pink that tires out the red receptors
and forces the park's grass to look greener than it really is. On second
thought, I'm not sure that makes this seem any less out there.